A Short Post on the Long Game in Russia

While the recent trial, conviction, and incarceration of Pussy Riot have refocused Western attention on the sham that is “managed democracy” in Russia, the long game rumbles on. Two recent developments warrant some attention as portents of political change on a time scale the 24/7 press rarely discusses.

First, the opposition continues to get organized. On the eve of the Pussy Riot frenzy, an assemblage of opposition groups announced plans for an online election this October. If all goes according to plan, voters will choose a Coordination Council that will try to hash out some of the differences among Russia’s fractious opposition groups and lead a more effective campaign against the “power vertical.” To enhance its validity and heighten the contrast with politics as usual, the intra-opposition election will be publicly audited by experienced observer groups.

Second, Putin’s popularity continues to decline. According to a recent survey by the highly respected Levada Center, the president’s approval rating has slipped to 63 percent, about where it stood in the wake of December 2011’s scandalous elections. More telling, though, were the answers to a question about who respondents would like to see in the president’s post six years from now. On that score, only 22 percent named Putin, while 49 percent said they would like to see a new face as head of state.

In contrast to Joshua Foust, I’m not convinced that the elevation of Pussy Riot to Western cause célèbre is a bad thing. The group’s plight certainly isn’t novel, and some of the reactions of their case have been misguided or downright laughable, but the spectacle of the trial and the absurdity of the trio’s sentences may have helped sharpen many outsiders’ understanding of just how authoritarian the Russian regime really is.

At the same time, I can’t help but think that the Pussy Riot frenzy has basically been a distraction from the long game on which democratization in Russia really depends. This episode is to Russian politics what the scandal of the week is to the American presidential race: a momentary digression from a process that actually turns on deeper, slower-moving processes which are harder to see and less exciting to talk about.

The fact is, international outcry and diplomatic squeezes will not end Putinism. This regime will not come undone without serious pressure from its own citizenry. Of course, it’s hard to generate this kind of pressure—and, more important, even harder to sustain it—against a president who’s widely liked with an opposition that’s disorganized. Those two variables still tilt in Putin’s favor for now, but the developments highlighted above suggest they are trending against him.

Leave a comment


  1. Grant

     /  August 24, 2012

    This is what made people realize how authoritarian Russia is (or tries to be)? Not the murder of honest reporters, assassinations of dissidents or charges filed against dead men (who died in Russian custody)? I wonder if newspapers simply want to have an excuse to put the word ‘pussy’ on headlines.

    On a completely different track, we’ve heard article after article about how bad American politics have gotten over the past two years. Can you think of any realistic* proposals for reform? Any other political systems that would be better suited for the current U.S.?

    *And by proposals I mean something more than ‘give Congressmen a limited number of votes that they’re allowed to use in a year’.

    • I gather that most Americans pay very little attention to foreign affairs, and consideration of the character of the Russian regime is probably a small slice of that small slice. So, yes, I suspect that what this case showed about Putinism was a surprise to many people, even without the side serving of titillation.

      As for institutional reforms in the U.S., well, that’s a huge topic that deserves a lot more care than I could give in a comment, and one on which I’m less qualified to say.

      • Grant

         /  August 25, 2012

        Sorry, I misspoke. I meant have you come across any proposals by anyone else (i.e. links)?

  2. Thanks for this one, Jay. But I do have to say: the red font on the black-and-white banner at the top of your blog is awfully hard to read. I would rethink that if I were you.

    • Thank you on both counts. I’d noticed the problem with the header but hadn’t gotten around to fixing it. I’ll try to get that sorted out soon.

  3. After writing this post, I saw an article in the latest issue of Foreign Affairs that makes the same point about trends in popular attitudes, only with a lot more depth and nuance. The article—gated, unfortunately—is by Mikhail Dmitriev and Daniel Treisman, and you can find it here:



Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Author

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • Follow Dart-Throwing Chimp on WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 13,612 other followers

  • Archives

%d bloggers like this: