Military Coup in Thailand

This morning here but this afternoon in Thailand, the country’s military leadership sealed the deal on a coup d’etat when it announced via national television that it was taking control of government.

The declaration of martial law that came two days earlier didn’t quite qualify as a coup because it didn’t involve a seizure of power. Most academic definitions of coups have involve (1) the use or threat of force (2) by political insiders, that is, people inside government or state security forces (3) to seize national political power. Some definitions also specify that the putschists’ actions must be illegal or extra-constitutional. The declaration of martial law certainly involved the use or threat of force by political insiders, but it did not entail a direct grab for power and technically was not even illegal.

Today’s announcement checks those last boxes. Frankly, I’m a bit surprised by this turn of events, but not shocked. In my statistical assessments of coup risk for 2014, Thailand ranked 10th, clearly putting it among the highest-risk countries in the world. In December, though, I judged from a distance that the country’s military leadership probably didn’t want to take ownership of this situation unless things got significantly worse:

The big question now is whether or not the military leadership will respond as desired [by anti-government forces angling for a coup]. They would be very likely to do so if they coveted power for themselves, but I think it’s pretty clear from their actions that many of them don’t. I suspect that’s partly because they saw after 2006 that seizing power didn’t really fix anything and carried all kinds of additional economic and reputational costs. If that’s right, then the military will only seize power again if the situation degenerates enough to make the costs of inaction even worse—say, into sustained fighting between rival factions, like we see in Bangladesh right now.

I guess the growing concerns about an impending civil war and economic recession were finally enough to tip military leaders’ thinking in favor of action. Here’s hoping the final forecast I offered in that December post comes true:

Whatever happens this time around, though, the good news is that within a decade or so, Thai politics will probably stabilize into a new normal in which the military no longer acts directly in politics and parts of what’s now Pheu Thai and its coalition compete against each other and the remnants of today’s conservative forces for power through the ballot box.

Leave a comment


  1. Brian

     /  May 22, 2014

    It’s the economy from folks I know and trust in Thailand. You’re absolutely right to use the cost benefit equation . When Toyota talks about delaying investment and moving, and Vietnamese economy continues to grow at 5%+ p.a., maybe the way to think about coups is how wars begin and end. When the major elements of cost / benefits make a resolution the best alternative.

  2. Going back to your 2014 prediction forecast, Thailand also had a large spread between the two models you used. One model had it near 0.2 (the eighth highest in the world) while the other was much closer to 0, placing it outside the top 40. So why did one model get it correct and the other model miss?

    • Sharp eye! The forecast from the logistic regression model is about 1%, and from the Random Forest, about 20%.

      Unfortunately, the answer I can give to your question isn’t quite so sharp. The two models use virtually the same information—the RF adds indicators for geographic region—so the divergence probably isn’t a function of differences in inputs. Instead, it’s likely a function of differences in the way the two models apply those inputs. What I can’t readily do with RF that I can with logistic regression, though, is decompose the solution for a specific case. I can see which variables are more influential in the aggregate, but that’s not the same thing. In other words, RF is a bit black boxy in this regard, and that makes it difficult to give an answer to your question that’s more specific than “It’s the method, not the model.”

  1. Why Thailand Has Had More Coup Attempts Than Almost Any Other Country - AltoSky - AltoSky
  2. Why Thailand Has Had More Coup Attempts Than Almost Any Other Country | We Report
  3. Ripple Effects from Thailand’s Coup | Dart-Throwing Chimp
  4. Why Thailand Has Had More Coup Attempts Than Almost Any Other Country | Enrayados
  5. How does businesses get affected in Thailand’s coup? | Thailand's Coup

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Author

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • Follow Dart-Throwing Chimp on
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 13,611 other followers
  • Archives

%d bloggers like this: